Nearly half (46%) of those aged 55 and over, are more likely than any other age group to favour sustainable packaging - choosing this option above others including convenience and the shelf life of a product, according to new analysis by PwC and The Grocer Vision.
They are also more likely to be impacted by the 'Attenborough effect', as 60% say that TV has been the biggest factor in making them think about the climate and social consequences of packaging.
However, 18-24 year olds, who are most likely to be influenced by social media when it comes to making buying decisions, are also happiest to pay over 15% more for an item if it has high sustainability credentials.
The Beyond Plastics: Grocery Shopping in a Sustainable Future analysis found that TV programmes such as the BBC's Blue Planet, and civil action by environmental groups may play a role in impacting the buying decisions of UK consumers.
Additionally, the survey, which charted the opinions of more than 1,000 UK adults, found:
Consumers also state that plastics in the ocean are their number one environmental concern, while over half of survey respondents (63%) believe that the responsibility to ensure packaging does not damage the environment or society, lies with packaging and food and drink manufacturers, and not Government or retailers.
Simon McKay, Paper and Packaging Leader at PwC UK, said:
“The public outcry against plastics may be seen as superficial for some. But, when 30% of consumers claim they have switched their regular brand to ones with more sustainable packaging - there is no doubt of the commercial impact for businesses that fail to take action.
“This creates a dilemma. What shoppers often believe is the right thing to do is not always the most sustainable packaging option.
“Should businesses be either charging forward and investing in the most sustainable packaging format currently available, or taking a more measured approach?
“Our survey showed that 41% of shoppers would not be prepared to pay more for sustainable packaging. So, it's critical that firms ensure that whichever approach they adopt, they do so keeping in mind the concerns of the consumer, and the potential for future changes in environmental and regulatory focus.
“For example, plastic packaging comes out favourably in comparison to many materials when looking at greenhouse gas emissions.
“This is a fast evolving maelstrom of public opinion, with a reluctance to compromise on packaging performance, all taking place against a raft of emerging legislation. It’s clear there are no simple choices in this new packaging reality.
“However, there are win-wins for organisations. Take action today, but also ensure you have the agility to respond quickly to a changing environment tomorrow.”
Notes to editors
A copy of the PwC and The Grocer Vision report, Beyond Plastics: Grocery Packaging in a Sustainable Future, and the full data is available on request, please call Diana Yeboah on 074834222914 or email firstname.lastname@example.org
PwC and The Grocer Vision asked a nationally representative sample of 1098 adults a series of questions, including:
At PwC, our purpose is to build trust in society and solve important problems. We’re a network of firms in 158 countries with over 250,000 people who are committed to delivering quality in assurance, advisory and tax services. Find out more and tell us what matters to you by visiting us at www.pwc.com.
PwC refers to the PwC network and/or one or more of its member firms, each of which is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details.
© 2019 PwC. All rights reserved