Deal? No deal? No Brexit? The scenarios explained

Caroline Turnbull-Hall Director Regulation and Legal Issues, PwC United Kingdom 09/05/19

Two exit days have now passed, and despite intense political debate, a number of ministerial resignations, and much speculation, there is still little clarity as to what the eventual outcome of Brexit will be, and indeed when the UK might leave the EU. In November, the Prime Minister referred to the choice facing Parliament as leaving the EU with a deal, leaving without a deal, or having no Brexit.

Here Caroline Turnbull-Hall, our Brexit Policy lead, explores the impact that recent developments might have on the eventual outcome, and considers some of the possible scenarios that could follow.

Things are moving quickly and, whilst this was up to date at the time of writing, it may have been superseded by events. Please get in touch with our Brexit specialists if you have any queries.

Following agreement between the European Council and the UK to further delay exit day until 31 October 2019, there is currently no clear solution to the Brexit impasse. The Withdrawal Agreement failed to gain Parliamentary approval on 29 March, and despite two days of indicative votes, no single option commanded a majority in Parliament. The current position is that the Prime Minister continues to seek a compromise deal with Labour, all outcomes remain on the table and, almost three years after the referendum, the UK remains a member of the EU whilst uncertainty reigns.

What extension has been agreed?

Following the Prime Minister’s request for a short extension to 30 June, on 11 April she accepted the European Council’s offer of a “flextension” (a flexible extension). Consequently the UK is committed to remaining in the EU until 31 October, unless the Withdrawal Agreement can be ratified earlier, in which case exit day will be 11pm on the first of the month following the day on which ratification is completed.

In addition, the European Council has once again reiterated that there would be no opening of the Withdrawal Agreement that was agreed between the UK and the EU in November 2018.

As a result of the European Council’s decision, the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018, has been amended again to change exit day, in part to ensure that the no deal statutory instruments, which will come into force on exit day in the absence of a deal, did not automatically apply from 12 April, the previous default exit date.

What next?

With just over six months to go, the options appear to be as follows: 

  • advantage is taken of the longer extension, to agree a revised approach to Brexit which could lead to

    • an exit from the EU with a deal;

    • a second referendum;

    • no deal; or

    • revocation of Article 50.

Note that time has run out for the option under which the Prime Minister would bring the Withdrawal Agreement back to the House of Commons and it would be approved before 22 May, allowing the UK to leave the EU on 1 June.

So let’s explore each of the remaining options in turn, and also consider the impact of the forthcoming European Parliament elections.

European elections

In a statement to the House of Commons on 11 April, the Prime Minister was clear she was aiming for the UK have an agreed deal by 22 May and to leave by 11pm on 31 May, which would avoid the need to hold European Parliament elections. With the passage of time and no substantive progress towards approval of the Withdrawal Agreement, it is now impossible for the legal processes to be completed to enable the Withdrawal Agreement to be ratified by 22 May. As a result the UK will be holding European Parliament elections on 23 May.

The European Council was clear that if the UK has not ratified the Withdrawal Agreement by 22 May and failed to hold European Parliament elections, then the UK would automatically leave the EU on 1 June. This risk of a no deal Brexit at the start of June has now been avoided.

Time will tell what impact the results of the European elections in the UK might have on the political landscape, and by extension, future Brexit negotiations.

In the event that the Withdrawal Agreement is ratified before 30 June, and the UK leaves the EU on 1 July, the UK MEPs elected on 23 May would not take up their seats on 2 July, when the new European Parliament sits for the first time.

Is the existing deal off the table?

On 25 March the Prime Minister stated that there was insufficient support for her deal to hold a third meaningful vote the following day, and the Withdrawal Agreement was not approved by the House of Commons on 29 March. However the Prime Minister has since stated that, to expedite the process and with the approval of the House, the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill might be brought forward early, as this will be required in any deal situation, and the Withdrawal Agreement itself is not open to renegotiation. This bill will write the terms of the Withdrawal Agreement into UK law, and is required before the Withdrawal Agreement, which is an international treaty, can be ratified.

There will still need to be a meaningful vote, as required by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, which will be a single motion covering both the Withdrawal Agreement and the future framework (the Political Declaration). However, the two main hurdles remain getting the Withdrawal Agreement approved, as ratification of this is the defining feature in the European Council’s decision, and reaching an agreement on the future framework.

How might a longer extension help?

Following the European Council meeting on 10 April, Donald Tusk warned the UK “Please do not waste this time”, and so if the Prime Minister is unable to get approval for the existing deal, the pressure will be on for the UK to find a new approach to Brexit whilst remaining a member of the EU. 

A compromise agreement with Labour

To enable the Prime Minister to find a way out of the current political impasse, talks started on 3 April between the Prime Minister and Jeremy Corbyn to see if a compromise, or unified, approach could be found, although no agreement has yet been reached. If a compromise approach can be agreed on between the two main parties, this would need to be approved by Parliament before being presented to the European Council as possible alternative strategy for Brexit.  The most likely area that any compromise is likely to focus on is a Customs Union, as one of the key elements of Labour’s Brexit strategy, and an option that has shown some traction in Parliament in the earlier indicative vote process.

If a compromise agreement cannot be reached, might there be further indicative votes?

In a statement to the House of Commons on 11 April the Prime Minister confirmed that, if a unified approach could not be agreed with Labour, the Government would seek to agree a small number of options for the future relationship that would be put to the House in a series of binding votes to determine which course to pursue. 

If any of the options presented to Parliament gets a majority of the votes, this would be taken to the Council as a proposed new approach. Based on the previous indicative votes, it is possible that either a Customs Union (defeated by three votes on 1 April), or a confirmatory referendum (defeated by 12 votes), might be the preferred option.

If a different approach involves a confirmatory vote, or second referendum, it would be challenging, but not impossible, to put this in place before the deadline of 31 October. It is estimated that a referendum takes at least 22 weeks from start to finish, as legislation needs to be enacted, questions need to be agreed and assessed to ensure that they are unambiguous and unbiased, and there needs to be a period of campaigning before the vote itself. There are suggestions that a referendum could be organised in as little as twelve weeks, but this seems ambitious.

The European Council approves a way forward

If the European Council agrees to a revised way forward (e.g. a change to the Political Declaration), there would need to be a meaningful vote in the House of Commons to approve the new approach. The UK would then enact the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill, unless this has apready been done, and ratify the deal as required by the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010. Note that the EU would also have to ratify the deal, which requires unanimity.

Once ratification has taken place, and assuming that this is in advance of 31 October, the “flextension” agreed with the European Council provides that the UK can leave the EU on the first day of the following month. At this stage the transition period (set to end on 31 December 2020, but subject to a two year extension) will come into force to allow the UK and the EU to negotiate the future economic partnership, and for businesses and individuals to plan for the future, whilst continuing to operate under EU rules.

Once a deal has been agreed and ratified by both sides, it is expected that the second phase of negotiations around the future economic partnership would start immediately.

Bearing in mind the Summer recess, the European elections and the party conference season in the early Autumn, it is hard to see that the Withdrawal Agreement will be ratified before October and that exit day will be anything other than 31 October.

No deal by 31 October

Despite the latest extension, no deal is not off the table, and if no agreement on a deal can be reached by 31 October, either domestically or with the EU, the default position is that the UK leaves the EU without a deal. In this scenario, there would be no transition period and the numerous no deal statutory instruments will come into force, transferring EU legislation to ensure that the UK has a functioning statute book from 1 November.

It is possible, of course, that the European Council may grant a further extension, as in April President Tusk did not rule out a further extension beyond October. However this may not meet with support from the EU leaders, or be seen to be a desirable outcome from the UK perspective.

In the absence of a transition period businesses, individuals and public bodies will have to react immediately to the changes, and implement no deal contingency plans. The UK would revert to World Trade Organisation rules on trade (apart from where free trade agreements have been ‘rolled over’) and any exports to the EU would be subject to EU tariffs, as well as authorisation and certification. On 13 March the Government published its tariffs and quota arrangements for the first 12 months after a no deal exit, which will have been welcome news for some businesses. Additionally the Government also announced on 13 March its temporary no deal plans for the Irish Border which, although welcome in the short term, do not resolve the issue of the border on the island of Ireland in the long term.

In this case it is possible that negotiations with the EU would begin within a relatively short timescale to establish a new relationship between the UK and the EU in the future. But significant disruption should be expected, in at least the short term.

No Brexit

If ultimately no deal can be agreed after an extension of Article 50, the UK will move into uncharted constitutional waters and some emergency action will need to be taken.

One option available to Parliament would be to revoke Article 50. In December 2018 the Court of Justice of the European Union confirmed that a member state could revoke its notification under Article 50 to withdraw from the EU, and that there was no requirement to seek the permission of the other member states. However, the withdrawal must be unequivocal and unconditional, so cannot be used as a way to ‘buy’ additional time for negotiation either with the EU or domestically.

Interestingly the revocation decision must be taken ‘in accordance with ... constitutional requirements’. Legally this means that a vote in the House of Commons would suffice (assuming that a majority would support revocation of Article 50) but politically it may be necessary to hold a second referendum.

Whilst there is some political momentum for this option, this has not yet manifested in a decisive majority in Parliament despite recent opportunities for it to do so. Businesses should not therefore be planning on the basis of this scenario at this point.

So what next?

Which of these scenarios plays out is not clear at this stage. Although there is a breathing space, there will still be considerable uncertainty and so there is no time for complacency as things will continue to move quickly. Over the next weeks and months, it is vital that all businesses keep an eye on developments and, for now at least, continue to prepare for the ‘default’ option of a no deal exit on 31 October.  Read my colleague Phil Brown’s blog for how businesses should be adapting their plans in the light of the most recent extension of the Article 50 period.

Key terminology:

Meaningful Vote

“Meaningful vote” is the name that has been given to the vote referred to in Section 13 of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, and is the mechanism which ensures that Parliament must approve, or otherwise, the outcome of the negotiations with the EU.

View more

Indicative votes

MPs vote on a series of options designed to test the will of Parliament to see what, if anything, commands a majority.

Supporters of the indicative votes believe it could provide a way out of the current political stalemate. But they are not legally binding on the Government.

View more

Common Market 2.0 aka Norway Plus

Takes as its starting point the Norway’s relationship with the EU and seeks to build on it. The UK would reapply to join the European Free Trade Association (EFTA), which it left when it signed up to the EEC. If successful, it would join what is known as the "EEA pillar" of the EFTA agreement.

In essence, the UK would not leave the European Economic Area, to which it currently belongs as an EU member, and would remain a member of the single market. This plan envisages a "comprehensive customs arrangement" which would include a common external tariff as well as the UK having an input into future EU trade deals. The UK would retain freedom of movement, so British citizens would keep the right to live and work in the EU and vice-versa. However, as the EU consider that the four fundamental freedoms are indivisible, the UK would also have to ensure the other freedoms

It would remain in place until the agreement of a wider trade deal that guaranteed frictionless movement of goods and an open border in Ireland.

View more

Customs Union

A customs union is a group of states that have agreed to eliminate customs duties (import taxes) on trade between themselves, as well as reduce other administrative requirements. The EU’s customs union ensures EU member states all charge the same import duties to countries outside the EU. It allows member states to trade freely with each other, without customs checks at borders, but limits their freedom to strike their own trade deals.

The Customs Union, as proposed by Father of the House Ken Clarke, requires that any Brexit deal should include, as a minimum, a commitment to negotiate a "permanent and comprehensive UK-wide customs union with the EU" as part of the Brexit deal.

This would give the UK a close trading relationship with the EU, and would ensure that there would only need to be a minimum of checks at the Irish Border. However, it would mean that the UK would not be able to negotiate and conclude trade agreements with other non-EU countries.

View more

Single Market

Allows the free movement of goods, services, money and people (the four freedoms) within the European Union. The Single Market is not completely integrated so for example, a UK qualified auditor can not deliver their services in another EU market without going through local approvals.

It is worth noting that  the EU consider that the four fundamental freedoms are indivisible, so believe the UK could not select to keep some but lose or diminish others.

View more

Free Trade Agreement (FTA)

An agreement of two or more countries to cooperate to reduce trade barriers and to increase trade of goods and services with each other. This might involve reducing tariff barriers (taxes on inbound goods) or non-tariff barriers (e.g. making it easier for people to travel and work in another country).

View more

The Backstop

The ‘backstop’ is the proposed mechanism to satisfy the requirement, agreed by both the UK and the EU, that there will be no ‘hard border’ (ie no intrusive checking of goods or people) between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. The arrangement will automatically kick-in if there's no deal at the end of the extended transition.  In essence, the ‘backstop’ would mean all of the UK staying in a customs union with the EU, but Northern Ireland also staying part of and fully aligned to the ‘single market’ on all relevant rules, without any scope for divergence.

View more

European Economic Area (EEA)

The European Economic Area (EEA) extends the EU’s Single Market to three non-EU countries, which are also three of the four members of the European Free Area (Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein). EEA members are not covered by all EU treaties, for example, they are not party to the Common Agricultural Policy.

View more

European Free Trade Association (EFTA)

The European Free Trade Association is a trade organisation and free trade area comprising Norway, Switzerland, Iceland and Liechtenstein. All apart from Switzerland, are members of the EEA, with Switzerland having negotiated a special relationship with the EU. All four EFTA states are members of the Schengen area, and Norway and Switzerland enjoy tariff free access to the EU, without being members of the Customs Union.

View more

Contact us

Caroline Turnbull-Hall

Director Regulation and Legal Issues, PwC United Kingdom

Tel: +44 (0)7718 966482

Follow us