UK drone regulations and net risk

Balancing risk to unlock growth and save lives

drones

Commercial drones remove much more risk than they introduce. Our paper shows how a net risk approach to commercial drone operations could accelerate growth, unlock life-saving use cases and reduce overall societal risk.

What is net risk?

If commercial drones replace dangerous tasks like working at height, they reduce overall harm - net risk to society is lower.

Approach

In this paper we consider the risk perspective of specialist drone insurers who cover Comparable Countries (US, EASA member states, Canada, Singapore) and offer real-world insight because they have skin in the game. We analyse reported commercial drone incidents in the UK and Comparable Countries from 2022-2024 and conclude that commercial drone risk is intrinsically low. If drones replace traditional ways of completing dangerous tasks, they reduce overall harm and increase societal benefits.

We analyse the regulatory approach in Comparable Countries and find no evidence that the UK’s more complex and cautious regulatory stance has delivered safer skies than found in Comparable Countries, where expectations are clear (prescriptive) and more non-standard flights are allowed (permissive). There is, however, evidence the UK’s approach has delayed progress.

Next steps

Drawing on these findings, we suggest that the UK regulator picks winners and focuses on delivering prescriptive regulations (such as Pre-Defined Risk Assessments, PDRAs), rather than trying to solve everything for everyone and focussing solely on the expensive and complex SORA (Specific Operations Risk Assessment) process. We assess potential priority BVLOS (Beyond Visual Line of Sight) use cases using the following criteria:

  • Tangible benefits, including net risk
  • Relatively low aviation risk
  • Minimal regulatory complexity to implement
  • Clear end client “pull”

We suggest a focus on developing PDRAs for these use cases:

  • Emergency response
  • Powerline inspection
  • Maritime and coastal search and rescue
  • Rail inspection
  • Crop spraying and seeding

A change in mindset could give the UK an opportunity to enable safe, cost-effective BVLOS drone operations more quickly. Organisations are calling for this, but without it, they continue to use riskier legacy approaches (such as helicopter flights or working at height) where drones could be equally or more effective.

Read the full report

UK drone regulations and net risk: Balancing risk to unlock growth and save lives

(PDF of 2.97MB)

Contact us

Euan Cameron

Euan Cameron

AI and Emerging technology leader, PwC United Kingdom

Tel: +44 (0)7802 438423

Craig Roberts

Craig Roberts

Head of Drones, PwC United Kingdom

Tel: +44 (0)7771 930482

Joanne Murray

Joanne Murray

UK Drones Audit Lead, PwC United Kingdom

Tel: +44 (0)7525 281052

Ben Evans

Ben Evans

UK Drones, PwC United Kingdom

Tel: +44 (0)7742 457634

Follow us

Required fields are marked with an asterisk(*)

By submitting your information, you acknowledge that we may send you business insights that we consider relevant to your interests. Please see our privacy statement for details of why and how we use personal data and your rights (including your right to object and to stop receiving marketing communications from us). To stop receiving marketing communications from us, click on the unsubscribe link in the relevant email received from us or send an email to uk_emailconsent@pwc.com.

Hide