Client Money Entitlement Principles per Financial Contract

Financial Contract

Client Money Entitlement?

Rationale

Financial Contract governing Derivatives transactions:

ISDA (English Law) (no CSA)

No*

Click here

ISDA (English Law) (with CSA)

No*

Click here

ISDA (New York Law) (no CSA)

No*

Click here

ISDA (New York Law) (with CSA)

No*

Click here

IFEMA

No*

Click here

DRV (German Derivatives Master)

No*

Click here

FBF (French Derivatives Master)

No*

Click here

Financial Contracts governing Financing transactions:

GMRA

No*

Click here

OSLA

No*

Click here

GMSLA

No*

Click here

MEFISLA

No*

Click here

German SLA

No*

Click here

AFTI (France)

No*

Click here

AFTB (France)

No*

Click here

Financial Contracts governing Prime Brokerage transactions:

MPBA

No*

Click here

IPBA (pre MiFID)

No*

Click here

IPBA (post MiFID)

No*

Click here

MCA (pre and post MiFID)

Yes

Click here

MIFCA (standard)

Yes

Click here

MIFCA (no provision for segregation of excess margin)

No*

Click here

* Note however that it is LBIE’s view that a Client Money Entitlement arises in relation to sums specifically segregated on behalf of a client by LBIE prior to 07.56am on 15 September, 2008 and where the sums remained segregated as of this time (notwithstanding that the form of contract may not otherwise provide for a Client Money Entitlement). There may however be some limited instances where a Client Money Claim is determined by LBIE not to arise notwithstanding segregation of sums. In such cases, the relevant clients will be contacted directly by LBIE to explain the rationale for such a determination.

Contact us

Ed  Macnamara

Ed Macnamara

Chief Finance and Administrative Officer for Lead Advisory and Restructuring, PwC United Kingdom

Tel: +44 (0)7739 873104

Alison Grant

Alison Grant

Director, PwC United Kingdom

Tel: +44 (0)20 7804 7933

David Kelly

David Kelly

Performance and Restructuring Partner, UK Head of Insolvency, PwC United Kingdom

Tel: +44 (0)7974 332659

Follow us